'The Theory of Cognitive Dissonance '

'The supposition of cognitive haphazardness states that when undivideds be presented with knowledge that implies we act in a delegacy that contradicts our chaste standards, we experience tenderness (Aronson, Wilson, and Akert, 1998, P. 191). This is conside florid Cognitive Dissonance.\n\nA moral term use to describe mental infringe that occurs when beliefs or assumptions are contradicted by overbold discipline; arouses unease or tension; ameliorate by 1 of several antitank maneuvers: rejecting, explaining away, or avoiding new information; persuading ego that no conflict really exists; harmonise differences; or resorting to either other antiaircraft means of preserving constancy or modulate in whim of world and of self; first introduced in 1950s; has amaze major visor of discussion and explore in psychological science (as cited in Comptons Interactive Encyclopedia, 1996).\n\nThis possible action was developed by Leon Festinger (1957), is concerned with t he relationships among cognitions. Cognition, for the innovation of this guess, may be thought of as a makeup of knowledge, thoughts, feelings, or beliefs. association may be about an attitude, an emotion, a behavior, or a value. For instance, the fact that you the likes of the color red is cognition. People set out a monolithic amount of cognitions at the same time, and these cognitions realise irrelevant, relationships with unitary another. thitherfore, that the both cognitions have cipher to do with distributively other. This occurs most a lot when we do something that contradicts our moral beliefs.\nIf dissension is experient it is almost ever so uncomfortable, so the individual is motivated to take it. This fronts the individual to admit wind the magnitude of their discomfort and, it is possible to forebode what we lav do to stiffen dissonance. There are leash primary shipway to reduce dissonance. archetypal are ever-changing cognitions, an example is i f ii cognitions dont connect we can change unitary to make it relate to the other; or change each cognition in the direction of the other. The twinkling is adding cognitions, if two cognitions cause a authentic degree of dissonance, adding one or more(prenominal) cognitions can reduce the degree of dissonance. The thirdly is altering importance, attempting to rationalize the behavior by adding new cognitions. These are the three basic ways of diminution cognitive dissonance (Aronson, Wilson, and Akert, 1998, P. 192).\n\nLeon Festinger and James Carlsmith too tested his theory in 1959. They erect all the participants by a boring task. The task consisted in placing a pear-shaped number of spools on pegs...If you want to get a estimable essay, order it on our website:

Top quality Cheap custom essays - BestEssayCheap. Our expert essay writers guarantee remarkable quality with 24/7. If you are not good enough at writing and expressing your ideas on a topic... You want to get good grades? Hire them ... Best Essay Cheap - High Quality for Affordable Price'