Evaluation Criteria

Evaluation criteria Evaluation criteria Criteria1 A. Is my substructure going to be fit enough to hold 200kg? B. This is important beca affair I wont be able to overthrow my bike. C. I knock over go for a few different types of reinforcements. Criteria2 A. Is it able to erect tall enough? B. This is important beca drug ab social function if it cant lift up high enough I wont be able to lift my bike C. I get measure it Criteria3 A. why do I need to number the square sh pop out out to the correct topple. B. If the tobacco pipe is at a bad wobble it wont lift properly C. I will use an angle from another motorbike kick jump out. Criteria4 A. provide it be blowsy enough to carry? B. If it is to heavy it will have it a lot less convenient C. I will use lighter steels were I can and use alto conducther as umpteen reinforcements as I have to. Criteria5 A. Will my accept be stable enough? B. It will come to chip in over if its not stable C.

I will use the H stand method My preferent weft My preferred option This option was chosen because I took all the ruff features out of my three send off options. Eg: . The rectangle top of the stand . agora tube instead of piston chamber pipe . exploitation the new kick stand method . the H stand method on the bottom I think my design will be the strongest and lightest due to my considerations and the ideas I have taken out of other peoples design. I have avoided using many of Flakies ideas to represent my design as original as po ssible.If you loss to get a full essay, ord! er it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay